New Page 1
[ Bro.Nelson King F.P.S, a learned Masonic Scholar had
Lecture on Masonic Myths and Outright Falsehoods. He has
freely used in his speech portions of the articles by Brn.
Allen E.Roberts and Wallace E. Macleod. The copyrights in this article
Masonic Myths and Outright Falsehoods belong to The Philalethes Society.
This article was reprinted from
The Philatethes and is the copyright of the author Nelson King. FPS, from whom
permission was obtained by our Webmaster to repost the article in our website.
We are very thankful to The Philalethes Society
and to Bro. Nelson King for the said permission. The article is very informative
and analytical. Please read onů.]
AND OUTRIGHT FALSEHOODS
Nelson King, FPS
myths and outright falsehoods are continually spread concerning Freemasonry.
Throughout the centuries Freemasonry has taught its valuable lessons through
allegory and symbols. The man from Galilee used parables extensively and well.
Many historians and better speakers constantly employ anecdotes to illustrate
the points they want to make. These methods emphasize the search for truth in an
interesting and factual manner.
on the other hand, can be innocent or dangerous. They can be outright lies or
the perpetuation of distortions handed down through the generations. Many of
these were invented by Masonic writers and speakers to enhance the image of
Freemasonry. Some of these corruptions have caused the Craft problems with
creditable historians because they were outrageous lies.
actually, requires no exaggeration to magnify its greatness. The simple truth is
all that is required to tell its story. This is the reason for this speech is to
attempt to destroy the myths that have been prevalent, often for centuries, by
telling the truth.
Freemasonry is a religion.
Absolutely false. This is one of several arguments employed by certain religious
fanatics in an attempt to discredit Freemasonry. They quote Albert Pike and
Henry Wilson Coil, among others, neither of whom was a man of the cloth, to
"prove" their statements. Pike was not a researcher. Most of the
hundreds of thousands of words he wrote came from his own mind, or the minds of
others whom he never mentioned but with whom he agreed. Coil wrote millions of
words about Freemasonry, and he was a lawyer and an excellent Masonic
researcher. Most of the time the words of these and other writers are taken out
of context to "prove" the thesis of the anti-Masons. Freemasonry's
enemies conveniently ignore the thousands of Christian ministers, and Rabbis,
who prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Freemasonry, although religious is far
from being a religion. Here are just three of these Doctors of Divinity who have
proven the critics in error: Joseph Fort Newton, Norman Vincent Peale and
Forrest D. Haggard.
Freemasons are satanists, because in their Lodges they do not pray to Jesus
Christ, but to a generic God such as TGAOTU or TGG or TMH.
rubbish, Freemasonry encompasses all religions. Just because we do not pray to
one specific being does not make us satanic. If you follow their logic that we
Masons are satanist because we do not pray to Jesus then all Canadians must be
satanist because our National Anthem, which in itself is a prayer has the line,
"God keep our Land," not Jesus keep our Land. All Americans who sing
"God Bless America" which also in itself is a prayer, must be satanic
because they do not sing Jesus Bless America, every American who Pledges
Allegiance to The Flag, "One Country under God" not One Country under
Jesus, must also be a satanist. Why even all Englishmen, must be satanic because
they sing "God Save the Queen," not Jesus save the Queen. Anyone who
has been a witness in court and who has sworn to tell the truth the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, "So help me God" must also be satanic,
because they do not say So help me Jesus. To say we Masons are satanic is pure
Freemasonry is a secret society.
Unequivocally false. This is widely stated and believed, even by Freemasons.
Many Masons believe this so strongly they won't even talk to their wives and
families about the Craft. Many writers of yesteryear helped promote this error.
Our ritualists have added to the belief. The critics of Freemasonry want the
world to believe in this secrecy because they have little else on which to
stand. Yet by no stretch of the imagination can Masonry be termed a secret
organization. If it was, no outsiders would even know it exists. Anything that
is known is not secret. Without question there are many secret organizations
throughout the world, but only men and women within those circles are familiar
with them. Most, if not all, ritualistic religions have conclaves (literally:
rooms locked with a key from outsiders). Should these be condemned along with
Freemasonry? Secret means: "Kept from general knowledge or view; kept
hidden; operating in a clandestine manner"; and on and on. Secret groups
meet in places known only to the few. Freemasons meet in places clearly marked
for the public to see. Secret outfits never record anything that might become
public property. All Masonic functions are fully recorded, proceedings can be
read by the general public, thousands of books have been written and published
about Freemasonry, millions of words about the Craft come off printing presses
of secret organizations never advertise their affiliation; Freemasons proudly
wear the Square and Compasses and other emblems. The complete Emulation Ritual
[which is what our Work is based on can be found in the Scarborough Public
Library. Just get the book "Unlocked Secrets", why it even has
pictures of a BBC TV broadcast in 1967 which showed all of the three Craft
Degrees So let us dispel the myth that Freemasonry is a "secret
Organization." It isn't. It never has been.
many here were given or have a " Masonic Bible". Show of hands.
this is a myth. There is not such thing as an Masonic Bible. The Bibles
sometimes called "Masonic Bibles" are just Bibles (usually the King
James Version) to which a concordance, giving the Biblical citations on which
the Masonic Ritual is based, has been added. Sometimes reference material on
Masonic history is included.
The story of Hiram as we portray it in our Lodges is based on truth.
It isn't. It has been called an "allegory," but factually it isn't. An
allegory is a story within a story. What we portray is actually a fable. But
it's a fable that teaches valuable and unforgettable lessons. The Temple Solomon
had built to the glory of God was a fact.
story as told in the third, or Master Masons degree, is not meant to be factual.
In a broad sense it can be called a legend. The "Hiramic Legend" is an
important part of the teachings graphically imprinted on the mind of the
candidate. Allen Roberts said, The lessons found in the Legend of Hiram Abif
reach to the roots of the soul and spirit. They are instilled in the heart
forever. You were an active participant, so that these lessons would be deeply
implanted, never to be lost....The ultimate triumph of good over evil, and life
over death, has been depicted throughout the ages in drama, song and story.
Legends depicting a central figure being killed and then returned to life were
common to many religions and rites. These undoubtedly had a bearing on the
development of the lessons the ritualists of Freemasonry believed had to be
taught. But the Hiramic Legend is more intense, moralistic, and meaningful than
any that preceded it.
Abif did exist. He was a skillful worker in brass and other metals. He was sent
to assist King Solomon.... [But] the Hiram Abif who actually worked at
beautifying the Temple of Solomon lived to an old age! He died of natural
Pythagoras was Raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason.
So say the ritualists of yesteryear, and their successors have compounded the
fabrication. Pythagoras was indeed a great man. Although he left behind no
writings of his own, his students did. His influence has extended to the present
day. It is little wonder his teachings have reached into Freemasonry, even if
only fragmentarily. But, even if a form of Freemasonry was known while he lived
(582-507 B.C.), he could not have been made a Master Mason. This degree wasn't
invented (or had it evolved) until the late 1720's. Actually there are those who
believe that the Freemasonry that did mature into what we have today was
influenced by the Pythagoreans.
Much of our Masonic ritual was written by William Shakespeare.
There is no evidence to indicate Shakespeare even knew there was an organization
of stone masons that would eventually become Speculative Freemasonry. The old
Gothic Constitutions are the basis for The Constitutions of the Free-Masons
compiled by Dr. James Anderson in 1722 and adopted in 1723. There is nothing in
the Gothic tomes that remotely resembles the writing of the Bard. Many of
Shakespeare's phrases have found their way into the rituals of the Craft, but
they certainly were not written especially for this purpose. It would be nice to
claim William as an early accepted member, but we can't. Let's stop trying.
All, or most, of the Freemasons in Germany were murdered during the Nazi regime.
The truth about the horrors of Nazism will never be known. The number of German
Freemasons sent to concentration camps, the gas chambers, prisons, tortured or
murdered in their homes will never be known. Unscientific research, the only
kind possible in this case, seem to indicate that about two-thirds of the then
85,000 Masons in Germany were injured in some manner, this left one-third
untouched. The number actually murdered or tortured is open to conjecture. It
must be remembered that the Nazi horror reached into other countries and the
Freemasons in them.
do know without question that Freemasonry is the first organization proscribed
by dictators. An organization that believes in and teaches the Brotherhood of
Man under the Fatherhood of God, that believes in the search for truth, cannot
be allowed to exist under a dictatorship.
Adolf Hitler hated and feared Freemasonry.
Not exactly. Oral histories (or accounts) can easily be fabricated, this is
especially true when publication comes after the subject's death. With this in
mind I will tell you of such conversation recorded from Gesprache Mit Hitler was
reported to say. "Freemasonry has always been harmless in Germany." It
"achieves the fruition of fantasy through the use of symbols, rites and
magic influence of emblems of worship. Herein lies the great danger which I have
taken in hand. Don't you see that our party must be something very similar, and
order, an hierarchic organization of secular priesthood? This naturally means
that something similar opposing us may not exist. It is either us, the
Freemasons or the Church but never two side by side. The Catholic Church has
made its position clear, at least in regard to the Freemasons. Now we are the
strongest and, there, we shall eliminate both the Church and the
Freemasonry did not operate during World War II in the countries controlled by
It did, but not openly. (Even today there are countries in which Freemasons must
meet in secret.) In the infamous Buchenwald concentration camp the Masonic
population reached close to 100 in October 1944, According to M. Jattefaux, a
French Freemason, the known Masons met daily. By occupying the minds of these
men with Masonic ritual and lessons helped relief them of their anxieties.
Masonic subjects were selected and by word of mouth transmitted from one prison
block to the next prison block. There quiet discussions would take place. Then
block by block the results of their debate returned.
American Brothers have been saddled with many myths. Such as.
Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry were Freemasons.
Neither Thomas Jefferson or Patrick Henry were members of the Craft. An
exhaustive search of Masonic records in Virginia, and elsewhere, offers no iota
of evidence to make them Freemasons. Jefferson participated in the cornerstone
laying of his University at Charlottesville, which was done Masonically. He
praised Freemasonry and his own words proved he had never been a member of the
All of George Washington's generals during the War for American Independence
Thirty-three of the generals serving under Washington were members of the Craft,
a long way from "all." The late James R. Case and Ronald E. Heaton
made comprehensive studies of the Revolutionary period and debunked many of the
claims considered here.
Washington insisted that the Marquis de Lafayette be made a Mason before he
would promote him to general, and the same claim has been made about the Baron
Both Lafayette and von Steuben were Freemasons before they arrived to help fight
the British. This was true of Lafayette even though he wasn't 21 years of age
when he arrived in America. It's highly likely that Washington never did know
they were Masons. The stories of both of these men are highly interesting, but
space prohibits the telling of them here.
The Boston Tea Party was organized in St. Andrew's Lodge in Boston and its
member participated in tossing the tea into Boston Harbor.
So well has the secrecy surrounding the Boston Tea Party been kept that to this
day not a single participant can be truthfully named! It's true that St.
Andrew's Lodge didn't meet on the night of the "party." This proves
nothing. The "T" that has been claimed is part of the minutes of the
Lodge is actually an indistinguishable scroll. By no stretch of the imagination
can it be called a "T" or any other letter.
There is no such thing as a woman freemason:
Femine Freemasonry and Co-Masonry do exist, in fact there are many many Feminine
Grand Lodges, the largest concentration of women masons is in England with some
because mainstream Grand Lodges do not recognize them does not mean that they do
Prince Hall Grand Lodges only accept Christian, black men as members.
All 44 Prince Hall Grand Lodges accept men of all faiths and color. In fact at
one time there were Prince Hall Lodges composed of mainly white Jewish members.
Prince Hall Grand Lodges use what we would call the American Ritual, either
Duncan's or Webb's, which is very similar to what the two St. Johns Lodges of
London use. By June of 1996 the only two Canadian Grand Lodges not extending
full recognition to Prince Hall, will be the Grand Lodge of Alberta, and the
Grand Lodge of Canada in the Province of Ontario.
Pope Clement XII condemned Freemasonry in 1738.
THE POPE DIDN'T DO IT There are many sources to prove Clement XII was not
mentally or physically able to preside over his religious kingdom. What follows
is based on information from several of these sources, particularly Papes, Rois,
Franc-Macons: L'histoire de la franc-maconnerie des origines a nos jours (Popes,
Kings, Freemasons: The History of Freemasonry from its origins to the present)
by Charles V. Boker, 1977. For the whole term of his papacy, Pope Clement XII
was blind and sick. He didn't sign the Bull condemning Freemasonry that bore his
name. His church has been living under false assumptions as far as it concerns
this organization of friends and brothers. Clement, 78 when he assumed the papal
throne on July 30, 1730, shortly after became seriously ill. His health
continued to rapidly deteriorated. Within two years after assuming the papal
throne he became completely blind. His hand had to be guided to the place where
his signature was required on documents. The pope reportedly said, when he heard
about something his nephew and others did that made him unhappy: "Well, let
them do as they wish, since they are the bosses anyway." The suffering of
the pope was graphically described by Boker, whose information from many
authentic sources was carefully documented. Clement's gout was particularly
severe causing him to practically lose his memory. Until his death he was,
without question, senile. But it served the purposes of those surrounding him to
keep him on the throne.
the continual deterioration of Pope Clement, Cardinal Nero Corsini ran the Holy
See with tyrannical power. It was he who called together his cohorts to produce
the condemnation of Freemasonry. Among these conspirators was the Chief
Inquisitor of Florence. The dastardly deed was done on June 25, 1738. Boker
proves that none of these participants were theologians; none were knowledgeable
about what they were asked to rubber stamp. "You don't have to be very
clever to see that a man who had been completely blind for six years, who had
taken no part in Church business for even longer, who had been suffering from
senile debility for two years, could not have been the one who drew up the
Bull," writes Boker. "The fact is, he didn't even sign the Bull that
was proclaimed in his name." In an accompanying photo copy of the document
only one name appears. And it's written in the calligraphic style of the balance
of the document! Not a single name of those taking part in the atrocity appears
anywhere on it! Freemasonry, if Pope Clement knew anything about it, was never
condemned by him.
my opinion and I stress that this is only my opinion, the reason the Catholic
Church banned Freemasonry was because there was a power struggle in Church
between the Jesuits and those who were the rulers of the Holy See. The Jesuits
who as we all know where and are the intelligencia of the Church were and in
some cases still are Freemasons. For example Freemasonry was brought to Costa
Rica by the Jesuits. Some 25 years ago when cleaning out the Basilica in San
Jose, a Bishops Miter was found and given the Grand Lodge of Costa Rica. So
what, well this Miter is adorned on the front with an embroidery of the 18th
degree Rose Croix, the piligan pecking at her breast to feed her young. Yes this
is a Christian symbol, however on the tails of the Miter is embroidered the
Square and Compasses. But I digress. Lodges were formed and held in the Vatican.
Because they met in secret, Cardinal Nero Corsini was afraid that the Jesuits
might take over the Holy See. Again, can I prove it. No. But it makes an
Brethren the hour grows late, but there are many, many more myths but these will
have to keep for an other time. Thank you for your attention and thank you for
once again inviting me to address you. Thank you.